InvestingCongress
  • Investing
  • Business
  • Stock
  • Politics
Business

Federal judge overturns $4.7 billion jury verdict in ‘Sunday Ticket’ lawsuit, ruling for NFL

by August 2, 2024
August 2, 2024

LOS ANGELES — A federal judge has overturned a jury’s $4.7 billion verdict in the class-action lawsuit filed by “Sunday Ticket” subscribers against the NFL and has granted judgment to the NFL.

U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez ruled Thursday that the testimony of two witnesses for the subscribers had flawed methodologies and should have been excluded.

“Without the testimonies of Dr. [Daniel] Rascher and Dr. [John] Zona, no reasonable jury could have found class-wide injury or damages,” Gutierrez wrote at the end of his 16-page ruling.

The jury on June 27 awarded $4.7 billion in damages to residential and commercial subscribers after it ruled the NFL violated antitrust laws in distributing out-of-market Sunday afternoon games on a premium subscription service.

The lawsuit covered 2.4 million residential subscribers and 48,000 businesses in the United States who paid for the package on DirecTV of out-of-market games from the 2011 through 2022 seasons.

The jury of five men and three women found the NFL liable for $4,610,331,671.74 in damages to the residential class (home subscribers) and $96,928,272.90 in damages to the commercial class (business subscribers).

Since damages can be tripled under federal antitrust laws, the NFL could have been liable for $14,121,779,833.92.

It is not the first time the NFL has won a judgment as matter of law in this case, which has been going on since 2015.

In 2017, U.S. District Judge Beverly Reid O’Connell dismissed the lawsuit and ruled for the NFL because she said “Sunday Ticket” did not reduce output of NFL games and that even though DirecTV might have charged inflated prices, that did not “on its own, constitute harm to competition” because it had to negotiate with the NFL to carry the package.

Two years later, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the case.

It is likely the plaintiffs will again appeal to the 9th Circuit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS
previous post
Board Approves Development of Boorara
next post
Harris officially secures Democratic nomination for president

You may also like

Is a Chinese chain’s blood orange cold brew...

July 7, 2025

Essence Fest leads a summer of events for...

July 4, 2025

Tariffs and weaker beer demand are weighing on...

July 3, 2025

Microsoft laying off about 9,000 employees in latest...

July 3, 2025

Apple sues former Vision Pro employee for allegedly...

July 2, 2025

As his feud with Trump reignites, Musk’s business...

July 2, 2025

Lululemon sues Costco over selling alleged dupes

July 1, 2025

Clean energy stocks fall as Trump bill would...

July 1, 2025

Google makes first foray into fusion in venture...

July 1, 2025

Home Depot is buying GMS for about $4.3...

July 1, 2025
Join The Exclusive Subscription Today And Get Premium Articles For Free

    Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!

    Recent Posts

    • Trump’s Big Beautiful Bill to Rewrite America’s Energy, Mining and Tech Future

      July 8, 2025
    • Australian Mines Enters Earn-in Deal with Cabral for Boa Vista Gold Project

      July 8, 2025
    • Kobo Resources Launches Limited Edition Jersey to Support Village Communities Through Kobo Cup CSR Initiative

      July 8, 2025
    • Stallion Uranium Enters into Technology Data Acquisition Agreement

      July 8, 2025
    • Top 5 Junior Gold Mining Stocks on the TSXV in 2025

      July 8, 2025
    • About us
    • Contact us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 investingcongress.com | All Rights Reserved

    InvestingCongress
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Stock
    • Politics